PDA

View Full Version : Mace Windu Vs Darth Sidious


LARUTO
06-24-2005, 04:07 PM
so i was supposed to post this a while ago when i first saw the debate on this forum, but luckily i got this from starwars.com on thursday.

It's one of the fieriest debates of online fan forums: when Palpatine was cornered in his office's giant window-frame, was he really overpowered by Mace? Or was he faking to lure Anakin? Could Mace really have gotten the upper hand on the Sith Lord?

George Lucas is the ultimate keeper of the true answer, and he's not telling... yet, anyway. If you had asked me in the Summer of '03, when the sequence was first shot, I would have had a solid answer. But, if you asked me in the Fall of '04, when the sequence was re-shot, well... for those who want to debate, it's best to know more of the story of how this scene came to be.

This entire sequence changed significantly during postproduction. What we witnessed in Sydney told a different story. Anakin did not earn Mace's trust by ratting out Sidious right away. He did not agonize over his decisions while sitting alone in the Jedi Council chamber. He did not rush in at the last minute to witness a questionable balance of power. Instead, he stayed at Palpatine's side, in the Chancellor's private office, as Mace and his posse of Jedi barged in.

"Stand behind me," ordered Mace, in Sam Jackson's demanding tones. But Anakin didn't budge. Instead, he watched passively as Palpatine used the Force to snatch Anakin's lightsaber from his belt and attacks Mace and the Jedi. There's ample evidence of this original version for those with sharp eyes and behind-the-scenes photos. Heck, even Hasbro action figures with Palpatine packaged with Anakin's lightsaber got out there in the initial shipments.

So, if Sidious' entire duel played out before Anakin's stunned eyes, I'd be inclined to think that his fall was just for show. This changed after a screening George Lucas held for a few key colleagues. Their reactions underscored the shortcomings of the way this duel was constructed. Anakin's inaction was hard to justify cinematically. "The story was there, but it wasn't clear," said Lucas at the time it came to rebuild this scene. "It was too abstract. We opened up that part and looked at what we could do."

When word of the change came down, the keepers of continuities started carefully tracking the evolving consequences. Palpatine had two lightsabers, then, since he loses this one in the duel with Mace. I still have in my inbox a tentative email from one of the authors asking, "um, have we figured out yet whose lightsaber Palpatine uses in the fight with the Jedi?"

At first, it was feared it was impossible to CG the small svelte-handled weapon over Anakin's relatively chunky handle, but nonetheless, that was the lightsaber given to McDiarmid for the pickup photography. The shots of Palpatine rising from his chair and extending the weapon were reshot. The bulk of the duel between Sidious and Mace stayed from principal photography, except for a new touch -- a kick to Palpatine's face, done with stunt double Michael Byrne. This was shot on a partial set of just a piece of window-frame on Friday, August 27.

So... with this revised duel, if Sidious threw the fight, it places an awful lot of faith on Anakin's timing ...and he suffered a kicked-in face to boot. For what it's worth to those arguing, I doubt there's anyone who thinks Palpatine's serious when he claims he's too weak. That's obviously a lie. But was the fall into the corner that preceded his pleas for help a lie as well?

What else changed in this scene? There are a few more interesting details, particularly where it moved in the sequencing of the story. But that will have to wait for another entry.

Paradoxxx
06-25-2005, 10:51 AM
Interesting reading indeed. I am sure questions of a similar nature have been brought up before in past episodes, has Lucas ever answered any of them?

Do we have "a new hope" :) that lucas would answer this in years to come?

bushman
06-25-2005, 03:28 PM
im not a star wars buff but ive seen all the movies and i knew a few star wars buffs. In my opinion it was very possible Windu over powered Sidious but only because of a few key factors.

1 Windu is much like Yoda a Child of the Lightsaber, He is extremly skilled with it, while Sidious main power lies in mind tricks and force powers ( not saying he not sick with sabers aye )

2 At that point and time alot of his evergy was being used to hold how he looked his human form as well as keep hold over the council, so he wasnt at 100% when he battled windu

3 The mn did fight how many jedi + master windu, I doh care how good u are fighting 5 6 men + one man close to your fighting skill + u done tired and worn out already chances are your going down.

LARUTO
06-25-2005, 04:56 PM
Para>>> i kinda hope he doesn't answer them, it would keep the internet debates alive if he stays mum. with respect to past episodes, especially empire strikes back, alot of people have asked how the hell did luke stand up to vader for so long with such minimal training? that as well as the vader vs sidious question from a new hope have never been answered officially.

Bushman>>> i hear where you coming from with respect to the battle, but i disagree on that second point entirely. i always held the view that it was the force that corrupted palpatine's appearance and he used that same force to hide his defects, but i'm not so sure anymore. i would say this, IF he was using the force to hold his appearance, and he is bold enough to attack 4 jedi masters at once, he is very confident in his skill, no doubt he is certain of his victory, so why continue to hold up the image of your face? in addition, he was not using the force to hold the council to his views, he abused his diplomatic influence from the very first episode, he played the senators based on their emotions and manipulated them into agreeing with his ideals. also, i hardly think the fight he had with the other jedi masters made him tired, he ran through them.

kayode
07-24-2005, 11:32 AM
Interesting...

Paradoxxx
07-24-2005, 12:42 PM
How bout this one...

Maybe sidious wasnt deformed and became so as a result of the 'lix' he got from windu.

Pablo_Diablo
07-24-2005, 04:11 PM
"The dark side energies flowing through Palpatine's body were so intense, that they ravaged his mortal frame. The very source of Palpatine's strength was killing him.
To counter the dark side's consumption, Palpatine turned to a bizarre combination of technology and Sith magic. Palpatine used Spaarti cloning cylinders to create a store of younger bodies, and employed an ancient Sith technique to transfer his consciousness into a waiting clone. Thus, Palpatine could avoid death indefinitely -- as long as his supply of clones remained intact. He would change his form again and again, prolonging his life. Palpatine constructed a secret throne-world deep within the galaxy's core, on a shadowy world called Byss. Here, he kept his clones safe, protected by a loyal cadre of Dark Side Adepts. "
http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/palpatine/?id=eu
I think it was set up, the part that confinced me is when Windu drop the same line that Palpatine did when Anakin fought Dooku.

PhoeniX
07-24-2005, 08:30 PM
i think that sidius wud win over windu

even tho windu was rel skilled wit his saber it was sidius's plan to be overpowered by him in order to pull anakin over to the darkkkkkk side

and plus yoda ran from sidius in the their battle remember he climbed in the vent shaft or whatever it was??

Hidden
07-24-2005, 08:55 PM
Yoda acted gay.
I don't see the big idea of running away, he still had some fight left.!

Pablo_Diablo
07-24-2005, 09:07 PM
The way i see it, Yoda had to retreat beacuse by time he got back to sidious, sidious woulda already had re-enforcements.

LARUTO
07-27-2005, 10:44 AM
Yoda's strength came from the living foce, sensing so many Jedi who he had grown close to die made him substantially weaker than he normally was. he did the smart thing, retreat and regroup, had he not done that, he would have died and the deaths of the other jedi would have been in vain.